A word from Rando

I once knew of a group that had an interesting feature. Like any group, it had a leadership structure. For every position, there was an anti-position, so to speak. Pretty much, every leader had their own personal gadfly whose job was to poke as many holes in the leader’s ideas as possible. The goal was to make sure the leader was forced to be as rigorous in their thinking as possible. When bad and/or just unworkable ideas were tried out, sometimes they were shot down. That’s just the way it is sometimes. Hell, as brilliant as I can be, once in a while even I have a stinker of a thought ðŸ˜‰ Ahem. What ifs, ripple effects, unintended consequences, as well as unforeseen possibilities were, in theory, brought out. By this method they sought to better able themselves to fulfill their mission. Read more!!

Compare and contrast

PBS: ‘Plenty’ is still unknown about Trump’s interactions with Putin, says former NSC staffer

For contrast and comparison, imagine Obama and Hillary not releasing their tax returns and having un-documented conversations with hostile foreign powers while everything is clouded with countless other suspicious behaviors.

I thought Team Red hated un-documented people taking American jobs, and now we have on in the WH 😉